WWW.SA.I-PDF.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Abstracts, books, theses
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 17 | 18 || 20 | 21 |   ...   | 35 |

«The Unwritten Rules of PhD Research Gordon Rugg Marian Petre THE UNWRITTEN RULES OF PHD RESEARCH THE UNWRITTEN RULES OF PHD RESEARCH Gordon Rugg and ...»

-- [ Page 19 ] --

There are lots of words and phrases which indicate weakness. Some of these are of a type usually known as ‘weasel words’, whose purpose is to help you wriggle out of committing yourself to an assertion and substantiating it.

Weasel words usually have no place in academic writing, and certainly not in a dissertation. It is not normally good enough to say that something ‘seems’ to be something else: is it or is it not? Similarly, ‘probably’ isn’t good enough.

Weasel words suggest that the author has not looked hard enough, or is making speculations which cannot be substantiated.

Whenever you justify something, you raise the question of why it needed justifying in the first place, and whether your justification of it was good enough. Anything which involves assumptions is also leaking blood (e.g.

‘presumably the respondents believed that...’) Words such as ‘probably,’ ‘presumably’ and ‘must have’ are another way of saying, ‘I have no firm evidence for this, and am guessing’. If you have evidence, present it; if you don’t have evidence, and the issue is important, then get evidence and find out whether you are actually right in your guess. Speculation is something which should either be explicitly labelled as speculation (and therefore of only WRITING STYLE 113 tangential relevance) or saved for the closing stages of the discussion section where you are discussing future work, or preferably both.

Vagueness is not acceptable. From an actual examiner’s report:

In an academic argument the details should all be nailed down, as far as this is possible. Often it is best to omit things of which one is unsure.

If this is possible they should not be present anyway. If it is not possible, they must be established definitively. Otherwise the conclusion will inherit the lack of precision. Then the whole work may simply become a piece of unproven speculation, which is unacceptable for a doctoral thesis.

One thing worth watching out for in this context is the temptation to use public-domain principles as explanations. The reason for this advice is that these principles are often untrue or seriously misleading. This is one case where the internet is positively useful – the sci.skeptic and alt.folklore.urban newsgroups are rich sources of widespread beliefs which have no basis in truth. Make sure you have a proper academic source for any explanatory principles you want to use. If you can’t find one, then it might be because the principle just isn’t true...

Don’t bluff If you don’t understand something, make time and work on it until you understand it. If you try to use technical concepts without understanding them properly, the critical reader will spot it instantly.

One apparent exception to this is when you are using advice about specialist tests (generally in the context of choice of statistical test). The normal convention in many disciplines is that in such cases, where the expertise is outside what a researcher in the domain could be fairly expected to know in detail, it is acceptable to take advice from two or more independent authorities in the relevant area and follow that advice. If they get it wrong, then that isn’t your problem, because you’ve taken reasonable steps. You’ll still need to understand what the statistical results mean, though.

Academic style: an example

The example below is from a paper by one of the authors and a colleague. It has been chosen specifically because its topic will be unfamiliar to most readers, making it easier to demonstrate the way in which language is being used at both the explicit and the ‘between the lines’ levels.

114 THE UNWRITTEN RULES OF PhD RESEARCH Direct evidence for hemispheric asymmetry in human and protohominid brains is in principle obtainable via endocranial fossil remains.

Unfortunately, the number of suitable skulls is limited, particularly for older species. Much the same problem applies to attempts to infer handedness from the weight and size of hand bones, on the principle that a more extensively used hand will be more robust (and therefore have larger bones) than the non-preferred one (Roy, Ruff and Plato 1994). There is evidence of such asymmetry in the long bones of the upper limb and shoulder girdle of Neanderthal specimens (Trinkhaus, Churchill and Ruff 1994; Vandermeersch and Trinkhaus

1995) but the paucity of suitable pre-Neanderthal material limits the scope for this approach.

There are several specific types of coded language in use here. These include the following.

Technical terms

Technical terms signal membership of the relevant research community:

‘hemispheric asymmetry, protohominid, endocranial, robust, non-preferred, long bones, upper limb, shoulder girdle’. ‘Robust’ is a technical term, the converse of ‘gracile’. ‘Long bones’ is also a technical term, contrasting with ‘short bones’.

References References signal familiarity with relevant literature: (Roy, Ruff and Plato 1994); (Trinkhaus, Churchill and Ruff 1994); (Vandermeersch and Trinkhaus 1995). All three are from within six years of the submission date of the article, and all are specialist journal articles.

General academic language General academic language signals membership of the general academic community: ‘in principle, via, much the same, infer, there is evidence of such, paucity’. Note how specific claims about inferring handedness via specific methods are supported by references, while a broad statement about lack of suitable fossil material is not supported by a reference. Within this research community, the lack of suitable fossil materials is a generally agreed truth which does not require a supporting reference; the authors have already demonstrated their membership of this research community via their familiarity with its literature and technical terms, so can make the broad statement without a supporting reference. Writing for a different research community, a supporting statement might well be needed (for instance, if the different WRITING STYLE 115 research community had not reached a consensus about the lack of suitable fossil remains, or was completely unaware of the issue).





Note also how an entire approach is described and rejected in two sentences.

The authors throughout assume that their readers will be familiar with a range of technical terms relating to physiology, such as ‘endocranial’ – this assumption is made because the paper is for publication in a journal catering for a well-defined research community (laterality researchers). This assumption reduces the need to unpack and explain terms; this in turn means that the writing can be terse and efficient. If the authors deal with terms unlikely to be known to the readers, then it is necessary to explain each term on the first occasion when it is used (as happens later in this paper when the authors describe flint artefact manufacture).

Writing as expressive behaviour Style and voice – and indeed the selection of content – do have a role in expounding your central argument, but they have an even larger role in conveying what sort of author you are.

Bad things to communicate are:

• I am ignorant, clueless and in despair;

• I am lazy, dishonest and rude, and I deserve to be hanged and flogged.

Good things to communicate are:

• I know what I’m doing;

• I’m a professional with the right attitude.

How do you communicate these things? They vary in easiness.

I’m a professional with the right attitude (easy concepts, but hard work)

• I pay attention to detail in things like spelling and the layout of the references

• I’ve done all the work I should have done, and demonstrated this in the write-up

• I’ve done a meticulous job of work and demonstrated this in the write-up

• I’ve presented this work neatly and exhaustively, following the conventions of this area 116 THE UNWRITTEN RULES OF PhD RESEARCH I know what I’m doing (requires knowledge of your chosen field and hard work)

• I know all the key texts, have read them and have cited them correctly

• I have read other relevant things as well and have cited them correctly

• I know and understand the technical concepts in this area and have been careful to use all the relevant ones somewhere in my write-up I am ignorant, clueless and in despair (all too easy to communicate, especially in the second year of a PhD)

• I have not read the key texts

• I have made classic mistakes without even realizing it, and have not had the wit to show my draft to a reliable mentor who would have spotted them ages ago

• My work contains apologies and pleas for mercy I am lazy, dishonest and rude, and I deserve to be hanged and flogged (effortless, if you’re a sinner)

• My work contains hardly any references

• My references are all from the internet, popular magazines or textbooks

• My spelling, grammar and presentation are dreadful

• I have attempted to conceal the dreadfulness of my spelling, grammar and presentation with jokes, clip art, a fancy binder, coloured pie charts and a grovelling acknowledgement to my supervisor

• I have misspelled my supervisor’s name and got their title wrong in the grovelling acknowledgement to them

• There is no evidence in what I have written that I have done any work

• Some paragraphs of my text are much better written than others, and bear a strong resemblance to articles on the internet

• I have done things which my supervisor specifically told me not to do

• My text compares theory and academia unfavourably with the ‘real world’ but I have not put my money where my mouth is and gone away into the ‘real world’ If these things apply to you, then you will probably not even be allowed to start a PhD – the initial selection process will almost certainly detect you and hurl you into the outer darkness (though you might manage to bluff your way onto an MSc, only to be failed when your dissertation erupts onto an unwilling world). It is unlikely that anyone fitting this description will be conscientious enough to bother reading this book anyway; we have included this section largely as a reassurance to virtuous but insecure students, so that they know they aren’t as bad as they sometimes fear.

WRITING STYLE 117

Getting it right

Avoiding mistakes is all very well, but what can you do that is positive?

One useful method is to go through your text with a highlighter, highlighting any words or phrases which would not be familiar to the average person on the street. This is particularly useful for your first page, and especially for the first paragraph, where first impressions count. An alternative is to delete any sentences which fail this test and see what is left.

Here are two examples. The first is fictitious, to protect the guilty, but closely based on horrible experience with MSc students. The second is real, to reward the virtuous, and comes from one of our MSc students. Both deal with the design of good web pages for commercial sites on the internet.

Example 1 The Internet is the fastest-growing technology that the world has seen.

Its now possible to download movie clips and the latest music via the Internet from sites across the world, and to watch events like a Shuttle launch happening in real time. The Internet clearly offers many opportunities to a company to advertise its products around the world for a fraction of what that would previously have cost. However, with so many companies competing for attention on the Web, it is particularly important for companies to have Web pages which are eye-catching and memorable, and which convey the right impression to the customer.

Otherwise, even if a customer does view the organization’s Web site, there is the risk of conveying the wrong impression and losing sales and wasting money in the process. Although the design and advertising communities have considerable experience of doing this sort of task via traditional media, it is not safe to assume that the same principles apply to Web page design as to printed page design, and this area clearly needs to be researched.

Example 2 At the core of software engineering lies the issue of software quality and this has resulted in the growth of the software metrics field of research.

Software metrics is based on measurement theory and there exists a comprehensive literature relating to both measurement theory and software metrics, [Fenton and Pfleeger, 1997], [Kitchenham et al., 1995], [Hall and Fenton, 1997]. Traditionally software metrics research has been in relation to application software. However, the rapid expansion of the Internet and corresponding growth in the number of commercial web sites [Rupely, 1997], [Jones, 1997], has given rise to a new set of problems relating to the development of metrics for a new class of software products including web pages, epitomised in the question ‘How good was my web site?’.

118 THE UNWRITTEN RULES OF PhD RESEARCH Numerous guidelines have been published with regard to the design of web sites but no recognised standards have yet been set with regard to the assessment of the quality of web pages [Nielsen and Molich, 1990], [Pfaffenberger, 1997], [Berk and Devlin, 1991].

Analysis If we strip out the terms which would not be familiar to the person in the

street, here is what we are left with:

–  –  –

The first example contains absolutely no evidence that the writer has ever studied the area. Depending on the marker’s world view, this answer might get a mark ranging from ‘just fail’, on the grounds that it was true and relevant but devoid of advanced knowledge, to zero, on the grounds that it contains no evidence of having studied the topic and could have been written by a member of the public who reads the occasional newspaper.

The second example shows that the writer has done his or her homework thoroughly, to the extent of quoting eight different sources, including a classic text and some advanced journal articles, in the first paragraph alone. This is the sort of thing which creates a good first impression. You don’t need to write the whole piece at this level of density, but you do need to establish your credibility early on. If you put the heavy stuff on page 2, it’s usually too late; the reader will already have formed a low opinion of you, and you will have the doubly hard job of undoing that low opinion and then persuading them to change it to a high opinion. (They’ll probably think that if you’re silly enough to have a lightweight first page, then there’s no point in changing their opinion of you.) Note that this example does not contain any WRITING STYLE 119 ‘buzzwords’ and that the English is pretty plain apart from the technical terms. It could only have been written by an expert, but can be read by a non-expert.

Spelling and punctuation Get your spelling and punctuation right. If necessary, buy a dictionary and/or go on a training course. They will probably be the best investments you will ever make. If you’re claiming to be a highly educated professional and you can’t spell or use punctuation correctly, then you’re off to a bad start.

Rhetoric and rigour Most students know that a PhD requires good theory, good documentary evidence, good science or good engineering. Many forget that it also requires good storytelling. Both rigour and rhetoric are essential ingredients of a successful dissertation. At most institutions, rhetoric is an explicit criterion for a PhD, expressed as ‘good presentation’ or ‘publishability’.

Books will tell you that the purpose of writing is to communicate. This is true. At the most crude and mercenary level, if you don’t communicate anything about your knowledge and ability, you won’t get any marks. (A blank sheet of paper, or a sheet of impenetrable waffle, get zero for being content-free, not full marks for having no mistakes...) The dissertation

There are certain things that you’re demonstrating through your dissertation:

• mastery of your subject;

• research insight;

• respect for the discipline;

• publishability.



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 17 | 18 || 20 | 21 |   ...   | 35 |


Similar works:

«PRACTICAL POINTERS FOR PRIMARY CARE ABSTRACTED MONTHLY FROM THE JOURNALS AUGUST 2002 OFFICE BP MEASUREMENTS VS MEASUREMENT BY AMBULATORY MACHINE OBESITY AND THE RISK OF HEART FAILURE OBESITY AND HEART FAILURE – RISK FACTOR OR MECHANISM? GUIDELINES FOR THE TREATMENT OF SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES HOMOCYSTEINE-LOWERING THERAPY IMPROVES OUTCOMES A PRIMARY CARE HOME FOR AMERICANS. PRIMARY CARE CLINICIANS NEED HELP WITHHOLDING ANTIBIOTIC TREATMENT IN PNEUMONIA PATIENTS WITH DEMENTIA HERPES...»

«Review of Successes and Failures of Mechanisation Trials on Platinum Mines of the Bushveld Complex Setshaba Nong A research report submitted to the Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Masters of Science in Engineering Johannesburg, 2010 DECLARATION I declare that this research report is my own independent work. It is being submitted for the Degree of Master of Science in the...»

«HANDBOOK FOR VOLUNTEERS OF THE IRISH REPUBLICAN ARMY NOTES ON GUERRILLA WARFARE CONTENTS Chapter Subject 1 Our Tradition 2 What Is Guerrilla Warfare? 3 Guerrilla Strategy 4 Tactics of Guerrillas 5 Organisation and Arms 6 With the People 7 Guerrilla Bases 8 Guerrilla Attack 9 Enemy Tactics 10 Guerrilla Defence 11 General Techniques 12 Battle Notes A Handbook for Volunteers of the Irish Republican Army, issued by General Headquarters, 1956. CHAPTER 1-OUR TRADITION No nation has a greater...»

«A TWO-PART DISCLOSURE MANDATE AS A COMPROMISE SOLUTION TO THE DEBATE ON SECTION 13(D)’S DISCLOSURE WINDOW DAVID DANIELS* ABSTRACT For several decades, Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 has required that investors acquiring more than 5% of the outstanding equity securities in a publicly traded company disclose to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) their stake in that company within ten days of exceeding the 5% threshold—thus acting as a de facto deterrence...»

«Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 11 March 2015 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Baili, I.K. and Gerrard, C.M. and Gutierrez, A. and Snape-Kennedy, L.M. and Wilkinson, K. N. (2015) 'Luminescence dating of irrigation systems : application to a qanat in Aragon, Spain.', Quaternary geochronology., 14 (B). p. 459. Further information on publisher's website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2015.02.016...»

«Watermarking Electronic Text Documents Containing Justified Paragraphs and Irregular Line Spacing Adnan M. Alattar and Osama M. Alattar Digimarc Corporation, Tualatin, OR 97062 ABSTRACT In this paper, we propose a new method for watermarking electronic text documents that contain justified paragraphs and irregular line spacing. The proposed method uses a spread-spectrum technique to combat the effects of irregular word or line spacing. It also uses a BCH (Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem) error...»

«CONSCIOUS MILLIONAIRE i Conscious Millionaire Copyright © 2014 by James V. (J V) Crum III All world rights reserved. Except for brief excerpts for review purposes, no part of this E-Book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, now or in the future known, without written permission from the publisher and the copyright owner. Limits of Liability/Disclaimer of...»

«VARIOUS USEFUL TECHNIQUES In this exercise we wi ll learn severa l things. Fi rst, how to weigh a solid. Place a piece of paper, abou t 15 em (6 in.) sq uare on the left pa n of a trip balan ce and cou nter balance this pape r either with ano ther pie ce of paper of approxima tely equal size or by ad just ing the '.ei gh ts. \ Veigh out 8 grams (g) of potassiu m chroma te as follows. From the bott le of K 2 Cr0 4 on the side shelf carefully po ur out, 011 a sepa rate sheet of p aper, wha t you...»

«Into the Breach: The Case for Robust Noncapital Proportionality Review Under State Constitutions Samuel Weiss* INTRODUCTION The Eighth Amendment forbids cruel and unusual punishments.1 The Supreme Court has found in the Amendment a guarantee that punishment be proportionate to the crime.2 Although the requirement technically applies equally to all punishment, in practice the Court has used the guarantee strictly to regulate capital punishment — a practice it recently extended to life without...»

«COMPARING TECHNIQUES FOR TETRAHEDRAL MESH GENERATION M. A. S. Lizier Instituto de Ciˆ ncias Matem´ ticas e de Computacao Universidade de S˜ o Paulo, Brazil e a ¸˜ a lizier@icmc.usp.br J. F. Shepherd Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM USA jfsheph@sandia.gov L. G. Nonato Instituto de Ciˆ ncias Matem´ ticas e de Computacao Universidade de S˜ o Paulo, Brazil e a ¸˜ a gnonato@icmc.usp.br J. L. D. Comba Instituto de Inform´ tica Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil a...»

«GUIDE & TESTIMONIALS For internal training use only E-Power Guide & Testimonials New Negative Potential Body Energizer E-Power was designed to provide Negative Potential Energy (Anion Effect) with High Frequency Energy (Resonance). Development and Studies Scientists 1: Earl Sutherland of the United States received the 1971 Nobel Prize for his discoveries regarding “the mechanism of the action of hormones.” He showed that the signal used to communicate between cells (the 1st Messenger) is...»

«Sensors 2015, 15, 4072-4096; doi:10.3390/s150204072 OPEN ACCESS sensors ISSN 1424-8220 www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors Article Development and Integration of a Solar Powered Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and a Wireless Sensor Network to Monitor Greenhouse Gases Alexander Malaver 1, Nunzio Motta 1, Peter Corke 2 and Felipe Gonzalez 3,* Institute for Future Environments, School of Chemistry, Physics and Mechanical Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, 3 George St, Brisbane 4000, Australia;...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2017 www.sa.i-pdf.info - Abstracts, books, theses

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.