WWW.SA.I-PDF.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Abstracts, books, theses
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 20 | 21 || 23 | 24 |   ...   | 36 |

«This page left intentionally blank. United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA-540-R-05-012 Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response OSWER ...»

-- [ Page 22 ] --

Sediment isolation using sheet piling commonly involves driving interlocking metal plates (i.e., sheet piles) into the subsurface, and thereby either blocking off designated areas or splitting a stream down the center. Highlight 6-3 shows an example of where this technology has been used. If a stream is split down its center, then one side of the stream may be excavated in the dry, after pumping out the trapped water. When the excavation of the first side of the stream is completed, water may be diverted back to the excavated side and sediment on the other side may be excavated. Sheet piling may not be feasible where bedrock or hard strata are present at or near the bottom surface. Where sheet piling is used to isolate a dredging or excavation action, project managers should consider potential hydraulic impacts of the diverted flow. Such diversion in most cases will increase natural flow velocity, which may scour sediment outside the diversion wall. If the sediment is also contaminated, as is likely to be the case, the increased dispersion of the sediment should be considered in design choices. Temporarily rerouting a water body with dams is sometimes done for small streams or ponds (Highlight 6-4). This includes the use of temporary dams to divert the water flow allowing excavation of now “dry” contaminated sediment.

The ability and cost to provide hydraulic isolation of the contaminated area during remediation is a major factor in selecting the appropriate removal technology.

6-7 Chapter 6: Dredging and Excavation Once isolated, standing water within the excavation area will need to be removed. Although surface water flows are eliminated, ground water may infiltrate the confined area. The ground water can be collected in sumps or dewatering wells. After collection, the ground water should be characterized, managed, treated (if necessary), and discharged to an appropriate receiving water body. Management of water within the confined area is another important logistical and cost factor that can influence the decision of wet versus dry removal techniques.

Highlight 6-3: Example of Excavation Following Isolation Using Sheet Piling Source: Pine River/Velsicol, EPA Region 5 Isolation and dewatering of the area is normally followed by excavation using conventional earthmoving equipment such as a backhoe or dragline. Where sediment is soft, support of the excavation equipment in the dewatered area can be problematic because underlying materials may not have the strength to support equipment weight. This also may reduce excavation depth precision. Both factors should be accounted for in design. When the excavation activities are complete, temporary dam(s) or sheet piling(s) are removed, and the water body is restored to its original hydraulic condition.

Another less common type of excavation project involves permanent relocation of a water body (also shown in Highlight 6-4). This, for example, was accomplished at the Triana/Tennessee River Superfund Site in Alabama and is being implemented at the Moss-American Superfund site in Wisconsin.

The initial phases of such a project may be similar to excavation projects that temporarily reroute a water body. However, in a permanent stream relocation project, a replacement stream normally is constructed and then the original water body is excavated or capped and converted into an upland area. To the extent the original water body is covered over, direct exposure to residual contamination is generally eliminated.

6-8 Chapter 6: Dredging and Excavation Highlight 6-4: Examples of Permanent or Temporary Rerouting of a Water Body A: Permanent River Relocation – Triana/Tennessee River Site The Triana/Tennessee River site consists of an 11-mile stretch of two tributaries, the Huntsville Spring Branch (HSB) and Indian Creek, which both empty into the Tennessee River. Remedial actions involved rerouting of the channel in Huntsville Spring Branch (HSB mile 5.4 to 4.0), the filling and burial in place of the total DDT (dichloro diphenyl trichloroethane and its metabolites) in the old channel, the construction of diversion structures at the upper and lower end of the stream to prevent stream reversion to the former stream channel, and the diversion of storm water runoff to prevent flow across the filled channel. Remedial actions for HSB mile 4.0 to 2.4 consisted of constructing four diversion structures; excavating a new channel between HSB mile 3.4 and 2.4; filling three areas;

constructing a diversion ditch around the fill areas; and excavating portions of the sediment from the channel.

These remedial actions effectively isolated in place 93% of the total DDT in the Huntsville Spring Branch-Indian Creek system of the Tennessee River. These remedial actions began on April 1, 1986, and were completed on October 16, 1987. Through March 1, 2001, the remedial actions have been inspected yearly by a federal and state Review Panel. The remedial action has not required any repair of the structures to maintain their integrity, and monitoring has shown that total DDT concentrations in fish and water continue to decline.

B: Temporary ReRouting of a River – Bryant Mill Pond Project at the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Site In EPA Region 5, an EPA-conducted removal and onsite containment action removed polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)-contaminated sediment from the Bryant Mill Pond area of Portage Creek. During the removal action, that was conducted from June 1998 - May 1999, Portage Creek was temporarily diverted from its normal streambed so that 150,000 yds3 of the creek bed and floodplain soils could be excavated using conventional excavation equipment.





PCB concentrations remaining after the removal action were below 1 ppm.

Source: U.S. EPA Region 5

Excavation may also include excavation of sediment in areas that experience occasional dry conditions, such as intermittent streams and wetlands. These types of projects generally are logistically similar to upland construction projects and frequently use conventional earthmoving equipment.

6.5 DREDGING TECHNOLOGIES

For purposes of this guidance the term “dredging” means the removal of sediment from an underwater environment, typically using floating excavators called dredges. Dredging involves mechanically grabbing, raking, cutting, or hydraulically scouring the bottom of a waterway to dislodge the sediment. Once dislodged, the sediment may be removed from a waterway either mechanically with buckets or hydraulically by pumping. Therefore, dredges may be categorized as either mechanical or hydraulic depending on the basic means of removing the dredged material. Some dredges employ

–  –  –

pneumatic (compressed air) systems to pump the sediment out of the waterway (U.S. EPA 1994d);

however, these have not gained general acceptance on environmental dredging projects.

6.5.1 Mechanical Dredging The fundamental difference between mechanical and hydraulic dredging equipment is how the sediment is removed. Mechanical dredges offer the advantage of removing the sediment at nearly the same solids content and, therefore, volume as the in-situ material. Little additional water is entrained with the sediment as it is removed. Thus, the volumes of contaminated material and process water to be disposed, managed, and/or treated are minimized. However, the water that is present in the bucket above the sediment must either be collected, managed, and treated, or be permitted to leak out, which generally leads to higher contaminant losses during dredging.

The mechanical dredges most commonly used in the U.S. for environmental dredging are the

following (Palermo et al. 2004):

–  –  –

• Enclosed bucket: Wire supported, near watertight or sealed bucket as compared to conventional open clam bucket (recent designs also incorporate a level cut capability as compared to a circular-shaped cut for conventional buckets, for example, the Cable Arm and Boskalis Horizontal Closing Environmental Grab); and • Articulated mechanical: Backhoe designs, clam-type enclosed buckets, hydraulic closing mechanisms, all supported by articulated fixed-arm (e.g., Ham Visor Grab, Bean Horizontal Profiling Grab (HPG), Toa High Density Transport, and the Dry Dredge).

The mechanical dredge types listed above reflect equipment used for environmental dredging and generally are readily available in the U.S. The enclosed bucket dredges were designed to address a number of issues often raised relative to remedial dredging including contaminant removal efficiency and minimizing sediment resuspension. However, newly redesigned dredging equipment may not be costeffective or preferred at every site. For example, in some environments, an enclosed bucket may be most useful for soft sediment but may not close efficiently on debris. A conventional clamshell dredge may have greater leverage and be able to close on or cut debris in some cases; however, material mounded over the top may be resuspended. An articulated mechanical dredge may have advantage in stiffer sediment since the fixed-arm arrangement can push the bucket into the sediment to the desired cut-level, and not rely on the weight of the bucket for penetration. Highlight 6-5 shows two examples of mechanical dredges.

6.5.2 Hydraulic Dredging

Hydraulic dredges remove and transport sediment in the form of a slurry through the inclusion or addition of high volumes of water at some point in the removal process (Zappi and Hayes 1991). The total volume of material processed may be greatly increased and the solids content of the slurry may be considerably less than that of the in-situ sediment although solids content varies between dredges (U.S.

EPA 1994d). The excess water is usually discharged as effluent at the treatment or disposal site and often 6-10 Chapter 6: Dredging and Excavation

–  –  –

Note: A = Cable Arm Corp. dredge (Source: Cable Arm, Corp.) B = Bean Company Horizontal Profiling Grab (HPG) dredge, New Bedford Harbor Site (Source: Barbara Bergen, U.S. EPA) needs treatment prior to discharge. Hydraulic dredges may be equipped with rotating blades, augers, or high-pressure water jets to loosen the sediment (U.S. EPA 1995b). The hydraulic dredges most

commonly used in the U.S. for environmental dredging are the following (Palermo et al. 2004):

• Cutterhead: Conventional hydraulic pipeline dredge, with conventional cutterhead;

–  –  –

• Plain suction: Hydraulic pipeline dredge using dredgehead design with no cutting action, plain suction (e.g., cutterhead dredge with no cutter basket mounted, Matchbox dredgehead, articulated Slope Cleaner, Scoop-Dredge BRABO, etc.);

–  –  –

• Pneumatic: Air operated submersible pump, pipeline transport, either wire supported or fixed-arm supported (e.g., Japanese Oozer, Italian Pneuma, Dutch “d,” Japanese Refresher, etc.);

• Specialty dredgeheads: Other hydraulic pipeline dredges with specialty dredgeheads or pumping systems (e.g., Boskalis Environmental Disc Cutter, Slope Cleaner, Clean Sweep, Water Refresher, Clean Up, Swan 21 Systems, etc.); and • Diver assisted: Hand-held hydraulic suction with pipeline transport.

Some of the hydraulic dredges included above have been specifically developed to reduce resuspension during the removal process. As with modified mechanical dredges, project managers should be aware that there may be tradeoffs in terms of production rate and ability to handle debris with many of these modifications. Highlight 6-6 presents examples of hydraulic dredges.

6.5.3 Dredge Equipment Selection

The selection of appropriate dredging equipment is generally essential for an effective environmental dredging operation. The operational characteristics of the three types of mechanical and six types of hydraulic dredges presented in the guidance sections above are listed in Highlights 6-7a and 6-7b. This information was reviewed by an expert panel and attendees at a special session on environment dredging at the Meeting of the Western Dredging Association (WEDA XXI) and the 33rd Annual Texas A&M Dredging Seminar in Houston, Texas. The operational characteristics and identified selection factors presented in Highlights 6-7a and 6-7b have been drawn from information compiled for this guidance as well as earlier published reviews of dredge characteristics. Quantitative operational characteristics (both capabilities and limitations) are summarized for conditions likely to be encountered for many environmental dredging projects. The numbers are not representative of all dredge designs and sizes available, but represent those most commonly used for environmental dredging. Qualitative selection factors for each dredge type are presented based on the best professional judgment of the panel and/or their interpretation of readily available data. Site-specific results and supporting references are available in Operational Characteristics and Equipment Selection Factors for Environmental Dredging (Palermo et al. 2004).

The information in Highlights 6-7a and 6-7b is intended to help project managers make initial screening assessments of general dredge capabilities and identify equipment types for further evaluation at the feasibility study stage or for pilot field testing. Note that whenever an equipment type receives a rating of “high,” it means that a particular dredge type should perform better for that selection factor. It is not intended as a guide for final equipment selection for remedy implementation. There are many sitespecific circumstances that dictate which equipment type is most appropriate for any given situation, and each type can be applied in different ways to adapt to site conditions. Project managers should use their own experience and judgment in using this information, and may find it useful to consider other sources of information for purposes of comparison. In addition, because new equipment is being continuously developed and tested, project managers will need to consult with experts who are familiar with the latest in equipment technologies. Experience has shown that an effective environmental dredging operation also depends on the use of highly skilled dredge operators familiar with the goals of environmental remediation, in addition to close monitoring and management of the dredging operation.

6-12 Chapter 6: Dredging and Excavation

–  –  –

6-13 6-14

–  –  –

Note: For additional information on development and technical basis for the entries in this table refer to: Palermo, M., N. Francingues, and D. Averett. 2004.

Operational Characteristics and Equipment Selection Factors for Environmental Dredging. Journal of Dredging Engineering, Western Dredging Association.

Chapter 6: Dredging and Excavation Highlight 6-7b: Footnotes for Sample Environmental Dredging Operational Characteristics and Selection Factors 1 This table provides some of the currently available general information that can help project managers initially assess dredge capabilities, and screen and select equipment types for evaluation at the feasibility study stage or for pilot field testing. This table is NOT intended as a guide for final equipment selection for remedy implementation, and regions may find it useful to consider other sources of information for purposes of comparison. There are many site-specific, sediment-specific, and project-specific circumstances that will indicate which equipment is most appropriate for any given situation, and each equipment type can be applied in different ways to adapt to site and sediment conditions. In addition, because new equipment is being continuously developed, project managers should consult with experts who are familiar with the latest technologies.

2 Equipment types shown here are considered the most commonly used for environmental dredging in the U.S. Other dredge types are available. Equipment used for environmental dredging is usually smaller in size than that commonly used for navigation dredging. Information presented here is tailored for mechanical bucket sizes from 3 to 10 cubic yards (about 2 to 8 m3), and hydraulic/pneumatic pump sizes from 6 to 12 inches (about 15 to 30 cm). Larger sizes are available for many equipment types.



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 20 | 21 || 23 | 24 |   ...   | 36 |


Similar works:

«Dragon Hall, Norwich (449N): Ceramic Building Material Sue Anderson, January 2001. Introduction A total of 2879 fragments of ceramic building material (CBM) weighing 407.051 kg was collected during the evaluation and excavation. This was only a sample of the large quantity of material found on the site. Table 1 lists the count and weight quantification of the CBM by category. Category No. Wt/g Roof tile 1412 83722 Pantile 107 10455 Chimney 2 245 Brick 20 1738 Early brick 741 142683 Late brick...»

«Ch. 29: Witnesses      29.1  Securing the Attendance of Witnesses by Subpoena and Other Process  A writ issued under the authority of the court to compel the personal attendance of a witness is called a subpoena ad testificandum (also called a witness subpoena). See Vaughan v. Broadfoot, 267 N.C. 691 (1966). Generally, a jurisdiction’s subpoena procedure is a statutory method of implementing a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to present a defense, which includes the right...»

«IMPACT oF HAbITAT TyPe oN FoRAGe QUALITy oF SeeDLING oAk LeAveS IN CeNTRAL wISCoNSIN Michael Demchik1 Abstract.—The objectives of this study were to determine if relative feed value or crude protein in seedling oak leaves was different between three central Wisconsin habitat type groupings. Seedling oak leaves of two species were collected from oak sites that represented either fully stocked or understocked conditions from three possible habitat type groupings: (1)...»

«BRANTFORD FIRE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT FIRE PREVENTION WEEK BURN CELLS: DEPICTING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SPRINKLER PROTECTION AND NON SPRINKLER PROTECTION Message fr om the Chief “On behalf of Deputy Chief Todd Binkley, Deputy Chief Andrew Lillico and the rest of the staff at the Brantford Fire Department, I am pleased to submit the annual report for 2015. The report offers an insight into the efforts and achievements that the department has accomplished in the past year. The report allows...»

«Nos. 104,081 104,082 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ANTONIO S. D. BROWN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Under K.S.A. 2010 Supp. 22-3210(d)(1), a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, for good cause shown and within the discretion of the court, may be withdrawn at any time before sentence is adjudged. 2. District courts should consider three factors when determining whether a defendant demonstrates good cause to withdraw a plea before sentencing:...»

«e e ltalt wintuto Os Transparencia y Acceso a la IrtforrilecIón de Tomaullpee ACUERDO MEDIANTE EL CUAL EL PLENO DEL INSTITUTO DE TRANSPARENCIA Y ACCESO A LA INFORMACIÓN DE TAMAULIPAS, EXPIDE LOS LINEAMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS PARA LA ATENCIÓN DEL DERECHO DE ACCESO A LA INFORMACIÓN El Pleno del Instituto de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información de Tamaulipas, en uso de la facultad que le confiere el artículo 68, párrafo 1, inciso I) de la Ley de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información...»

«1 Legoland A primary LEGO showpiece, Miniland USA is a celebration of American achievements, a canvas to illustrate the diversification of its peoples and cultures, past and present. —Legoland website T he main attraction of Legoland, a theme park just outside of Carlsbad, California, is Miniland USA, which features miniatures of quintessentially American places built from 20 million Legos. Miniland has a replica of Washington, complete with federal museums, monuments, the White House, and...»

«CHEMINSTRUMENTS ADHESION/RELEASE TESTER MODEL AR-1000 OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS PRODUCT DESCRIPTION UNPACKING ASSEMBLY Key Components OPERATION Theory of Operation Power Up Menu Format Load Cell Calibration Calibration Procedure Scale Setting Sled Speed Halt Mode Audible Beep Locating Function Switches Running a Test Test Procedure Grip Operation File Management Review Test Data Data Storage Deleting Test Data AR-1000 9/30/2009 EZ-LAB SYSTEM Installation Operation Calibration Speed Data Set...»

«Volume 17, Number 1 Print ISSN: 1096-3685 Online ISSN: 1528-2635 ACADEMY OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL STUDIES JOURNAL Mahmut Yardimcioglu Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University Editor The Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal is owned and published by Jordan Whitney Enterprises, Inc. Editorial content is under the control of the Allied Academies, Inc., a non-profit association of scholars, whose purpose is to support and encourage research and the sharing and exchange of ideas and...»

«Statement of Goldman Sachs: Background and Facts on Financial Intermediation, Certain Investments and Risk Management in the Commodities Markets November 19, 2014 Executive Summary Metro International and the Aluminum Market  There has not been a shortage of aluminum and prices have fallen substantially since 2008. There has been a consistent surplus of aluminum since 2008, resulting in a large volume that has been placed in storage. Each year approximately 49-50 million tons of aluminum are...»

«TOWN OF FALMOUTH MASSACHUSETTS ANNUAL REPORTS 2006 Annual Reports The Annual Reports book is a cooperative effort of all the departments and committees of the town. The individual reports arrive at the Town Hall in a variety of formats. This year’s range in size from 121 words telling of a very quiet year in Emergency Preparedness, to the nearly novel length 34,000 words of the Town Clerk’s report. The individual reports are formatted, assembled, and indexed into a 200 page word processing...»

«OCTOBER TERM, 2006 1 (Bench Opinion) Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus GLOBAL CROSSING TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. v....»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2017 www.sa.i-pdf.info - Abstracts, books, theses

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.