FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Abstracts, books, theses

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 24 | 25 || 27 | 28 |   ...   | 36 |

«Contents PART ONE 4 Chapter 1 5 Chapter 2 14 Chapter 3 19 Chapter 4 24 Chapter 5 30 Chapter 6 38 Chapter 7 41 Chapter 8 47 PART TWO 58 Chapter 1 59 ...»

-- [ Page 26 ] --

The alteration of the past is necessary for two reasons, one of which is subsidiary and, so to speak, precautionary. The subsidiary reason is that the Party member, like the proletarian, tolerates presentday conditions partly because he has no standards of comparison. He must be cut off from the past, just as he must be cut off from foreign countries, because it is necessary for him to believe that he is better off than his ancestors and that the average level of material comfort is constantly rising. But by far the more important reason for the readjustment of the past is the need to safeguard the infallibility of the Party. It is not merely that speeches, statistics, and records of every kind must be constantly brought up to date in order to show that the predictions of the Party were in all cases right. It is also that no change in doctrine or in political alignment can ever be admitted. For to change one’s mind, or even one’s policy, is a confession of weakness. If, for example, Eurasia or Eastasia (whichever it may be) is the enemy today, then that country must always have been the enemy. And if the facts say otherwise then the facts must be altered. Thus history is continuously rewritten. This day-to-day falsification of the past, carried out by the Ministry of Truth, is as necessary to the stability of the regime as the work of repression and espionage carried out by the Ministry of Love.

The mutability of the past is the central tenet of Ingsoc. Past events, it is argued, have no objective existence, but survive only in written records and in human memories. The past is whatever the records and the memories agree upon. And since the Party is in full control of all records and in equally full control of the minds of its members, it follows that the past is whatever the Party chooses to make it. It also follows that though the past is alterable, it never has been altered in any specific instance. For when it has been recreated in whatever shape is needed at the moment, then this new version IS the past, and no different past can ever have existed. This holds good even when, as often happens, the same event has to be altered out of recognition several times in the course of a year. At all times the Party is in possession of absolute truth, and clearly the absolute can never have been different from what it is now. It will be seen that the control of the past depends above all on the training of memory. To make sure that all written records agree with the orthodoxy of the moment is merely a mechanical act. But it is also necessary to REMEMBER that events happened in the desired manner. And if it is necessary to rearrange one’s memories or to tamper with written records, then it is necessary to FORGET that one has done so. The trick of doing this can be learned like any other mental technique. It is learned by the majority of Party members, and certainly by all who are intelligent as well as orthodox. In Oldspeak it is called, quite frankly, ‘reality control’. In Newspeak it is called DOUBLETHINK, though DOUBLETHINK comprises much else as well.

DOUBLETHINK means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them. The Party intellectual knows in which direction his memories must be altered; he therefore knows that he is playing tricks with reality; but by the exercise of DOUBLETHINK he also satisfies himself that reality is not violated. The process has to be conscious, or it would not be carried out with sufficient precision, but it also has to be unconscious, or it would bring with it a feeling of falsity and hence of guilt. DOUBLETHINK lies at the very heart of Ingsoc, since the essential act of the Party is to use conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies–all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word DOUBLETHINK it is necessary to exercise DOUBLETHINK. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of DOUBLETHINK one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth. Ultimately it is by means of DOUBLETHINK that the Party has been able–and may, for all we know, continue to be able for thousands of years–to arrest the course of history.

All past oligarchies have fallen from power either because they ossified or because they grew soft.

Either they became stupid and arrogant, failed to adjust themselves to changing circumstances, and were overthrown; or they became liberal and cowardly, made concessions when they should have used force, and once again were overthrown. They fell, that is to say, either through consciousness or through unconsciousness. It is the achievement of the Party to have produced a system of thought in which both conditions can exist simultaneously. And upon no other intellectual basis could the dominion of the Party be made permanent. If one is to rule, and to continue ruling, one must be able to dislocate the sense of reality. For the secret of rulership is to combine a belief in one’s own infallibility with the Power to learn from past mistakes.

It need hardly be said that the subtlest practitioners of DOUBLETHINK are those who invented DOUBLETHINK and know that it is a vast system of mental cheating. In our society, those who have the best knowledge of what is happening are also those who are furthest from seeing the world as it is. In general, the greater the understanding, the greater the delusion; the more intelligent, the less sane. One clear illustration of this is the fact that war hysteria increases in intensity as one rises in the social scale. Those whose attitude towards the war is most nearly rational are the subject peoples of the disputed territories. To these people the war is simply a continuous calamity which sweeps to and fro over their bodies like a tidal wave. Which side is winning is a matter of complete indifference to them.

They are aware that a change of overlordship means simply that they will be doing the same work as before for new masters who treat them in the same manner as the old ones. The slightly more favoured workers whom we call ‘the proles’ are only intermittently conscious of the war. When it is necessary they can be prodded into frenzies of fear and hatred, but when left to themselves they are capable of forgetting for long periods that the war is happening. It is in the ranks of the Party, and above all of the Inner Party, that the true war enthusiasm is found. World-conquest is believed in most firmly by those who know it to be impossible. This peculiar linking-together of opposites–knowledge with ignorance, cynicism with fanaticism–is one of the chief distinguishing marks of Oceanic society. The official ideology abounds with contradictions even when there is no practical reason for them. Thus, the Party rejects and vilifies every principle for which the Socialist movement originally stood, and it chooses to do this in the name of Socialism. It preaches a contempt for the working class unexampled for centuries past, and it dresses its members in a uniform which was at one time peculiar to manual workers and was adopted for that reason. It systematically undermines the solidarity of the family, and it calls its leader by a name which is a direct appeal to the sentiment of family loyalty. Even the names of the four Ministries by which we are governed exhibit a sort of impudence in their deliberate reversal of the facts. The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation. These contradictions are not accidental, nor do they result from ordinary hypocrisy; they are deliberate exercises in DOUBLETHINK. For it is only by reconciling contradictions that power can be retained indefinitely. In no other way could the ancient cycle be broken. If human equality is to be for ever averted–if the High, as we have called them, are to keep their places permanently–then the prevailing mental condition must be controlled insanity.

But there is one question which until this moment we have almost ignored. It is; WHY should human equality be averted? Supposing that the mechanics of the process have been rightly described, what is the motive for this huge, accurately planned effort to freeze history at a particular moment of time?

Here we reach the central secret. As we have seen. the mystique of the Party, and above all of the Inner Party, depends upon DOUBLETHINK But deeper than this lies the original motive, the neverquestioned instinct that first led to the seizure of power and brought DOUBLETHINK, the Thought Police, continuous warfare, and all the other necessary paraphernalia into existence afterwards. This motive really consists… Winston became aware of silence, as one becomes aware of a new sound. It seemed to him that Julia had been very still for some time past. She was lying on her side, naked from the waist upwards, with her cheek pillowed on her hand and one dark lock tumbling across her eyes. Her breast rose and fell slowly and regularly.

‘Julia.’ No answer.

‘Julia, are you awake?’ No answer. She was asleep. He shut the book, put it carefully on the floor, lay down, and pulled the coverlet over both of them.

He had still, he reflected, not learned the ultimate secret. He understood HOW; he did not understand WHY. Chapter I, like Chapter III, had not actually told him anything that he did not know, it had merely systematized the knowledge that he possessed already. But after reading it he knew better than before that he was not mad. Being in a minority, even a minority of one, did not make you mad.

There was truth and there was untruth, and if you clung to the truth even against the whole world, you were not mad. A yellow beam from the sinking sun slanted in through the window and fell across the pillow. He shut his eyes. The sun on his face and the girl’s smooth body touching his own gave him a strong, sleepy, confident feeling. He was safe, everything was all right. He fell asleep murmuring ‘Sanity is not statistical,’ with the feeling that this remark contained in it a profound wisdom.

***** When he woke it was with the sensation of having slept for a long time, but a glance at the oldfashioned clock told him that it was only twenty-thirty. He lay dozing for a while; then the usual

deep-lunged singing struck up from the yard below:

‘It was only an ‘opeless fancy, It passed like an Ipril dye, But a look an’ a word an’ the dreams they stirred They ‘ave stolen my ‘eart awye!’ The drivelling song seemed to have kept its popularity. You still heard it all over the place. It had outlived the Hate Song. Julia woke at the sound, stretched herself luxuriously, and got out of bed.

‘I’m hungry,’ she said. ‘Let’s make some more coffee. Damn! The stove’s gone out and the water’s cold.’ She picked the stove up and shook it. ‘There’s no oil in it.’ ‘We can get some from old Charrington, I expect.’ ‘The funny thing is I made sure it was full. I’m going to put my clothes on,’ she added. ‘It seems to have got colder.’

Winston also got up and dressed himself. The indefatigable voice sang on:

‘They sye that time ‘eals all things, They sye you can always forget;

But the smiles an’ the tears acrorss the years They twist my ‘eart-strings yet!’ As he fastened the belt of his overalls he strolled across to the window. The sun must have gone down behind the houses; it was not shining into the yard any longer. The flagstones were wet as though they had just been washed, and he had the feeling that the sky had been washed too, so fresh and pale was the blue between the chimney-pots. Tirelessly the woman marched to and fro, corking and uncorking herself, singing and falling silent, and pegging out more diapers, and more and yet more. He wondered whether she took in washing for a living or was merely the slave of twenty or thirty grandchildren. Julia had come across to his side; together they gazed down with a sort of fascination at the sturdy figure below. As he looked at the woman in her characteristic attitude, her thick arms reaching up for the line, her powerful mare-like buttocks protruded, it struck him for the first time that she was beautiful. It had never before occurred to him that the body of a woman of fifty, blown up to monstrous dimensions by childbearing, then hardened, roughened by work till it was coarse in the grain like an over-ripe turnip, could be beautiful. But it was so, and after all, he thought, why not? The solid, contourless body, like a block of granite, and the rasping red skin, bore the same relation to the body of a girl as the rose-hip to the rose. Why should the fruit be held inferior to the flower?

‘She’s beautiful,’ he murmured.

‘She’s a metre across the hips, easily,’ said Julia.

‘That is her style of beauty,’ said Winston.

He held Julia’s supple waist easily encircled by his arm. From the hip to the knee her flank was against his. Out of their bodies no child would ever come. That was the one thing they could never do.

Only by word of mouth, from mind to mind, could they pass on the secret. The woman down there had no mind, she had only strong arms, a warm heart, and a fertile belly. He wondered how many children she had given birth to. It might easily be fifteen. She had had her momentary flowering, a year, perhaps, of wild-rose beauty and then she had suddenly swollen like a fertilized fruit and grown hard and red and coarse, and then her life had been laundering, scrubbing, darning, cooking, sweeping, polishing, mending, scrubbing, laundering, first for children, then for grandchildren, over thirty unbroken years.

At the end of it she was still singing. The mystical reverence that he felt for her was somehow mixed up with the aspect of the pale, cloudless sky, stretching away behind the chimney-pots into interminable distance. It was curious to think that the sky was the same for everybody, in Eurasia or Eastasia as well as here. And the people under the sky were also very much the same–everywhere, all over the world, hundreds of thousands of millions of people just like this, people ignorant of one another’s existence, held apart by walls of hatred and lies, and yet almost exactly the same–people who had never learned to think but who were storing up in their hearts and bellies and muscles the power that would one day overturn the world. If there was hope, it lay in the proles! Without having read to the end of THE BOOK, he knew that that must be Goldstein’s final message. The future belonged to the proles. And could he be sure that when their time came the world they constructed would not be just as alien to him, Winston Smith, as the world of the Party? Yes, because at the least it would be a world of sanity. Where there is equality there can be sanity. Sooner or later it would happen, strength would change into consciousness. The proles were immortal, you could not doubt it when you looked at that valiant figure in the yard. In the end their awakening would come. And until that happened, though it might be a thousand years, they would stay alive against all the odds, like birds, passing on from body to body the vitality which the Party did not share and could not kill.

‘Do you remember,’ he said, ‘the thrush that sang to us, that first day, at the edge of the wood?’ ‘He wasn’t singing to us,’ said Julia. ‘He was singing to please himself. Not even that. He was just singing.’ The birds sang, the proles sang. the Party did not sing. All round the world, in London and New York, in Africa and Brazil, and in the mysterious, forbidden lands beyond the frontiers, in the streets of Paris and Berlin, in the villages of the endless Russian plain, in the bazaars of China and Japan– everywhere stood the same solid unconquerable figure, made monstrous by work and childbearing, toiling from birth to death and still singing. Out of those mighty loins a race of conscious beings must one day come. You were the dead, theirs was the future. But you could share in that future if you kept alive the mind as they kept alive the body, and passed on the secret doctrine that two plus two make four.

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 24 | 25 || 27 | 28 |   ...   | 36 |

Similar works:

«5 CHAPTER Rethinking the Finance System for Improved Student Achievement 1 ODDEN, ALLAN SARAH ARCHIBALD AND MARK FERMANICH Some version of standards-based education reform is likely to remain the focus of education policy for several more years, if not decades. By standards-based education reform, we mean a more general goal to have the education system—however financed and governed—educate more students to high achievement levels. This goal has equity and excellence elements, and is...»

«THOMAS F. LUCE, JR. 5550 Pleasant Avenue S Institute on Race and Poverty 229 19th Av S, N150 Minneapolis, MN 55419 (612) 827-0123 Minneapolis MN 55455 Luce_t@msn.com (612) 625-5344 tluce@umn.edu EDUCATION Ph.D. Public Policy Analysis, University of Pennsylvania, 1989. Fellowships: University (three years); Graduate Group (one year). Dissertation: Fiscal Federalism, Local Fiscal Stress and Economic Development M.Sc., Economics Birkbeck College, University of London, 1976. B.A. (with...»

«Does One Market Require One Money? Martin Feldstein Much of the current European discussion about monetary union, especially the discussion in official circles, assumes that the adoption of a single currency is necessary to perfect the free trade in goods and services that is called for in the European Community's 1992 plan. The European Commission has summarized this official view in the title of its publication One Market, One Money. In contrast, no one seriously suggests that the United...»

«LAURI SIISIÄINEN University of Jyväskylä THE SHEPHERD MEETS THE DIVINE ECONOMY: FOUCAULT, AGAMBEN, AND THE CHRISTIAN GENEALOGY OF GOVERNANCE I n his recent thinking, Giorgio Agamben has been occupied with an extensive project that he calls the genealogy and archaeology of Christianity. In particular, he has attempted to bring forth, how a certain paradigm of governance has developed in the history of theology (during a long period of time), first with the Church Fathers, and subsequently, in...»

«A CRITICAL LOOK AT BANKING SECTOR REGULATIONS IN CAMEROON Gilbert Ameh Akon E-mail: gilbertoameh@yahoo.co.uk Tel: +27786326740 Abstract: The Cameroonian banking sector has failed to make the required contribution to the economy, this paper seek to enquire whether such state of affairs is cause by ill-conceived regulations or whether the problem is at the implementation phase. Before doing this the paper took an eagle-eye view of the banking sector in the country. Findings reveal loopholes at...»

«Munich Personal RePEc Archive Book Review Risk-sharing in Finance The Islamic Finance Alternative Abdul Azim Islahi Islamic Economics Institute, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah KSA 15. May 2013 Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/50210/ MPRA Paper No. 50210, posted 27. September 2013 04:53 UTC JKAU: Islamic Econ., Vol. 26 No. 1, pp: 305-312 (2013 A.D./1434 A.H.) DOI: 10.4197 / Islec. 26-1.16 Hossein Askari, Zamir Iqbal, Noureddine Krichene, and Abbas Mirakhor Risk-sharing in Finance: The...»

«FINANCIAL INNOVATION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CATASTROPHE RISK1 Neil A. Doherty Neil Doherty, Department of Insurance and Risk Management Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 3641 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104. tel 215 898 7652 e mail doherty@wharton.upenn.edu December 1997 1An extended version of this paper was presented (Doherty 1997) was presented at the ASTIN conference in Cairns, Australia. A revised version is forthcoming in the Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. 1....»

«The Millionaire’s Seminar Foster Hibbard The Millionaire’s Seminar By Foster Hibbard Transcribed and reformatted By John Harricharan Copyright 2005 by John Harricharan Introduction I met Foster Hibbard many years ago. I was going through some very challenging times – my wife was battling cancer (we had no health or life insurance), I had two young children to take care of and there was hardly any money. Someone introduced me to Foster and thus started one of the most rewarding experiences...»

«ISSN-L: 2223-9553, ISSN: 2223-9944 Academic Research International Vol. 2, No. 3, May 2012 THE EFFECT OF DOLLARIZATION ON DEVELOPING ECONOMIES: LESSONS FROM SOMALIA’S INFORMAL MARKET Mohamed Ibrahim Nor Simad University SOMALIA. M.Ibrahim@simad.edu.so ABSTRACT Arguments on dollarization and its effect on the economy have been published mainly on economics and financial journals, yet, little is known about Somalia’s unofficial dollarization. To contribute in that matter, this paper presents...»

«EU Funding for NGO’s Value for Money? Value for Money? HuMANITARIAN Huma n Righ ts Demo crac y EIDHR eni ECH O DCI March 2016 May 2015 EU Funding for NGOsValue for Money? February, 2016 NGO Monitor's mission is to provide information and analysis, promote accountability, and support discussion on the reports and activities of NGOs claiming to advance human rights and humanitarian agendas. 1 Ben-Maimon Blvd. Jerusalem 92262, Israel Tel: +972-2-566-1020 Fax: +972-77-511-7030...»

«‘The Formula That Killed Wall Street’: The Gaussian Copula and Modelling Practices in Investment Banking Donald MacKenzie and Taylor Spears This article was published in Social Studies of Science 44 (2014): 393-417.Authors’ address: School of Social & Political Science University of Edinburgh Chrystal Macmillan Building Edinburgh EH8 9LD Scotland email: frances.j.burgess@ed.ac.uk; taylor.spears@ed.ac.uk Abstract Drawing on documentary sources and 114 interviews with market participants,...»

«(BA922TC1216MCY) (SL) DEPARTMENT STORES NATIONAL BANK CREDIT CARD DISCLOSURES ® FOR THE MACY’S AMERICAN EXPRESS ACCOUNT Interest Rates and Interest Charges Annual Percentage Rate 25.74%* (APR) for Purchases This APR will vary with the market based on the Prime Rate. APR for Cash Advances 25.74%* This APR will vary with the market based on the Prime Rate. Paying Interest Your due date is at least 25 days after the close of each billing cycle. We will not charge you any interest on purchases...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2017 www.sa.i-pdf.info - Abstracts, books, theses

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.